Thursday, June 16, 2011

Sharing the Vision

     My apologies for my long absence.  My new responsibilities as a school board trustee and my recent film endeavor have kept me very busy.  Interestingly, the two activities are related.  The common factor in both is that of "sharing the vision".

     In terms of my film, I thought that I had everything under control.  I knew what I wanted.  I wrote the script, cast the roles, established the setting, directed the film, shot the footage, and did the editing.  That should take care of it, right?  Wrong.  After I released the first version (the first of MANY) and attached the vision for the film with it, one of the actors (my actor/teacher son) said, "Gosh, Mom, if I'd known that was what you were going for, I would have played my role a lot differently."  Enter the sinking feeling of artistic defeat.  More of the actors shared similar thoughts, and I quickly realized that I had left out the most important people, the ones actually doing the work on screen.  All I could do at that point with a deadline approaching was piece a story together with editing magic.  Let's just say that I am no magician, and I don't know any illusionists who can really make something out of nothing.  I didn't have all the shots I needed, and I didn't have the time to get them.  Note to self:  Share the vision with all stakeholders FIRST!
     Okay, so the good part of this story is that I went through this before I attended my school board training where the TASB gurus talked about the importance of creating a great vision statement and then sharing it in detail with everyone it affects.  I didn't have a light bulb hanging over my head, but I had certainly seen the light. 
     I heard and read things such as:
  • The vision statement is written.
  • It lists or describes desired qualities for at least each of the following: students of the district, the community, and the schools in the district.
  • Staff and community input was solicited in some fashion and was considered.
  • All current members of the board and superintendent have agreed, in a formal adoption or re-adoption by the board, to be guided by the vision.
  • The board has formally adopted or re-adopted its vision statement within the last five years.
  • The board's annual calendar of activities or another written document clearly specifies when the vision statement will next be considered for review.
  • The vision statement is clearly posted in the board meeting room or copies are available at each meeting.
  • The vision statement is available on all campuses and all staff members have been informed about it.
     The above criteria were specifically outlined for the "newbies" so that we would understand just how important creating and sharing the vision is to the workings of the school district.  In addition to these, we were reminded of the following:
  • A vision statement is future-oriented.
  • It gives employees direction about how they are expected to behave and inspires them to give their best as they play out their roles in the "big picture", the "final cut of the film", if you will.
  • It communicates both the purpose and values of the school and the community.
     I can honestly - and sadly - say, that after 28 years of teaching, I can not remember a single time when we sat down and truly discussed the vision statement and what it meant to work toward it.  I had my own vision of what I wanted to accomplish, and I shared this with my department when we were asked to develop our portion of the Campus Improvement Plan.  However, so much of this came to us from the top down that we simply felt we were being handed more administrative paperwork that had to be on file somewhere in case anyone from the state level wanted to see what we were doing.  Shame on all of us at all levels for not taking this seriously.
      It is my contention that the board of trustees is responsible for "selling" the vision statement to the stakeholders.  Maybe this sounds too "Madison Avenue", but it is something Americans understand.  Someone develops an idea, and that idea is "pitched" to the stakeholders.  Then, question and answer sessions take place to clarify and specify the vision so that all who are a part of the "big picture" can establish specific goals that will support the vision.  This is often done in the reverse, which is not necessarily the most efficient way of taking on this task.  However, if the goals have already been discussed in a public forum with all groups represented, at least the dreams, wishes, and desires of these groups can assist the board in creating a workable vision.  
       I am now working on yet another film, a documentary this time.  Believe me when I say that I will share the vision FIRST!  Hopefully, there will be an opportunity to create a new vision statement for our district, and ideally there will be opportunities for trustees to explain the thinking behind the vision statement in order to get 100% buy-in from all interested parties. At the very least, we should give the ol' college try.

2 comments:

  1. Hi!
    I came across your blog while searching for C-scope reviews. Our district has gone to this awful curriculum and as a former teacher, parent and taxpayer, I am outraged by the smug approach by our administration of the way this was implemented. They implemented c-scope using all grade levels, all subjects with "exemplar" lessons. There are no textbooks for homework help. My husband is on the board and there are only 2 board members that disapprove of it. Several of the board members have been "bought" by our superintendent in some way or the other. Our district bought cscope w/o the board's knowledge. This is fact and has been proven on the monthy register. We had cscope all last year. This year, our district went from "recognized" to "academically unacceptable"! We were told that scores went down all over the state! Our teachers are being stifled. Some of the middle school teachers met with an asst. principal with their heart felt concerns over the stress of cscope. He in turn went to the principal and told her there was a morale problem. The principal demanded to know who come to him. He refused to give names so the of the asst. supt of curriculum came to him and told him he had to tell. He contacted his school association who confirmed that he had to give names. This asst supt's contract was non-renewed last year! Now, this middle school princial is being moved to central office as the asst supt of curriculum and the non-renewed asst supt is being moved to the HR position so the board can't touch her!! What, in your opinion can we do? My husband is beside himself with board members that are only listening to the superintendent. This man is slick. He has his doctorate that the district allowed him to get on school time - he took off all day on Wednesdays to travel to A&M - in a school vehicle (even though he has a travel stipend)to get this PhD. I know I've rambled but you seem to have it together. My husband has called the TASB attorney so many times he is on a first name basis with many of them. They can't believe what is going on! Do you have any suggestions? Our teachers are all wanting to quit!!!

    ReplyDelete
  2. First, let me say I completely understand what your district is experiencing. It is happening all over the state. I have had many conversations with very experienced teachers who are at the ends of their ropes. Actually, the forced implementation of a canned curriculum was one of the top 5 reasons I retired after 28 very successful years of teaching. Sadly, I am not the only one. Many wonderful teachers have called it quits, and it is a great loss for our students.
    What I have noticed about this kind of curriculum program is that it is perfect for the less than capable, unmotivated, uncreative teachers who don't want to think or push their students to a higher level. For the exceptional teachers, this is a slap in the face because it strips them of their autonomy and makes them feel as if they are not respected as professionals who are masters of their craft. Ultimately the kids are the ones who suffer because they either get teachers who have no depth of knowledge in their fields or teachers who are stressed from having to do something they know is bad for their kids.
    For the most part, board members are not educators, so they are at a loss in terms of what to approve or deny in terms of curriculum. If the administrator convinces them that it is worth the money, then most of the time they will approve it. This is where the teachers come in. Those who are courageous will need to educate the board either at the meetings or privately. Also, SBDM committees are the only other place where teachers have, by law, a voice. Check the Texas Education Code for the law, TEA for the intent of the law, and the local policy to make sure that your district is in compliance. This is where you start. Elections must be held for the 2/3 teaching staff, so nominate folks who are willing to speak out and present specific problems with the system.
    The key to solving this problem, as with many problems is communicate openly. I know this will be hard, but there is no other way. When teachers stop taking an active role in their schools, then administrators start micromanaging. Below are some links to what you need to know about SBDM. Good luck and hang in there. Our kids are worth fighting the good fight.


    Rationale for SBDM:
    www.tea.state.tx.us/WorkArea/linkit.aspx?LinkIdentifier=id&ItemID=2147491735&libID=2147491732

    TEC (Go to 11.251)
    http://www.statutes.legis.state.tx.us/docs/ed/htm/ed.11.htm

    Go to your district website to find your local policy. Then check it to see how it measures up to the law.

    ReplyDelete

I have adjusted the settings on the comments to allow you to comment without having a Google account. If this still does not work, I will call one of my former students who can help me out.